Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declarant was entitled to avail the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 under the arrears category on the basis of the adjudicated service tax demand, and whether the Designated Committee was justified in treating the declaration as one falling under the litigation category.
Analysis: The declaration was filed after an Order-in-Original had already quantified and confirmed the service tax liability. The adjudication order had attained finality because no appeal was filed, and the confirmed amount therefore answered the description of "amount in arrears" and consequently "tax dues" under the Scheme. The Scheme and the Rules permitted a separate declaration for arrears, and the pendency of the earlier show cause notice did not control the classification once the demand had been crystallised by the adjudication order. The Court applied the object of the Scheme as a beneficial legacy dispute resolution measure and held that a declarant should not be placed in a worse position than before seeking its benefit.
Conclusion: The declaration was correctly made under the arrears category, the Designated Committee's contrary treatment was unsustainable, and the petitioner was entitled to computation of the payable amount on the basis of the confirmed demand.