Supreme Court: Excise duty based on manufacturer's price to buyers. Bank guarantees discharged. The Supreme Court held that excise duty should be calculated based on the price charged by the manufacturers to the buyers, in this case, Bajaj ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court: Excise duty based on manufacturer's price to buyers. Bank guarantees discharged.
The Supreme Court held that excise duty should be calculated based on the price charged by the manufacturers to the buyers, in this case, Bajaj Electricals Ltd. The Court emphasized that this ruling is specific to the circumstances of this case and does not extend to manufacturers selling goods under their own brand name or brand name owners who are also manufacturers. The judgment discharged any bank guarantee provided by the petitioners and resolved similar writ petitions involving other brand names without awarding costs.
Issues involved: Determination of market value of goods for excise duty computation.
Judgment Summary:
1. The Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India concerns the market value of goods manufactured by the petitioner company for excise duty calculation. The petitioners manufacture electrical goods under an agreement with Bajaj Electricals Ltd. The dispute is whether excise duty should be based on the agreed sale price between manufacturers and buyers or the market value when sold by buyers to wholesalers.
2. The petitioners argue that the market value should be assessed at the price agreed upon with the buyers, as the goods are sold exclusively to the buyers at a stipulated price and not in the open market. The application of the brand name 'Bajaj' by the buyers enhances the value, which belongs to the buyers due to their ownership of the brand name.
3. The Supreme Court holds that excise duty should be levied based on the price charged by the manufacturers to the buyers, in this case, Bajaj Electricals Ltd. The Court clarifies that this decision does not apply to manufacturers selling goods under their own brand name or to brand name owners who are also manufacturers.
4. The judgment also discharges any bank guarantee furnished by the petitioners in relation to the Writ Petition. Writ Petitions raising similar issues with other brand names are also disposed of accordingly. No costs are awarded in this matter.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
