Incomplete record on job work exemption led to remand for fresh consideration of the appeal.

The Tribunal found that the appeal could not be rejected for want of documents where invoices and challans had already been filed before the Commissioner (Appeals). Because the record before the Tribunal did not contain the material needed to verify the appellant's claim that the activity was job work service covered by Notification No. 25/2012-ST, the dismissal basis could not be properly examined. The rejection was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after examination of the relevant invoices, challans and allied records.

---

---

Issues: Whether the rejection of the appeal for want of documents was sustainable and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The record showed that the appellant had submitted invoices and challans before the Commissioner (Appeals) before the impugned order was passed. The dispute also involved a claim that the relevant activity was job work service covered by the exemption entry under Notification No. 25/2012-ST. Since the documents necessary to verify the appellant's claim were not available on the record before the Tribunal, the basis for dismissing the appeal for lack of documents could not be properly examined. Fresh adjudication with all relevant invoices, challans and allied records was therefore necessary.

Conclusion: The rejection of the appeal was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration after examination of the relevant documents.

---