TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Classification of Flowmeters as Measuring Instruments: Coriolis Principle Application</h1> <h3>IN RE : ENDRESS + HAUSER (INDIA) PVT. LTD.</h3> IN RE : ENDRESS + HAUSER (INDIA) PVT. LTD. - 2021 (378) E.L.T. 548 (A. A. R. - Cus. - Mum.) Issues Involved:1. Classification of flowmeters under appropriate HS code.2. Applicability of previous rulings and decisions on the current applications.3. Evaluation of expert opinions and their relevance.4. Admissibility of applications for advance ruling.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Flowmeters under Appropriate HS Code:The primary issue in these proceedings is the classification of various models of flowmeters imported by the applicant. The applicant contends that these flowmeters, which measure parameters like mass flow, temperature, and density, should be classified under Heading 90.26 as instruments for measuring or checking the flow, level, pressure, or other variables of liquids or gases. The Authority examined the characteristics and functionalities of the flowmeters, noting that they operate based on the Coriolis principle and are used for measuring rather than controlling or regulating the flow of liquids or gases. The Authority concluded that these flowmeters fit the description under Heading 90.26, which specifically includes flowmeters. The General Rules for Interpretation of the Import Tariff and the HSN Explanatory Notes support this classification, emphasizing that the flowmeters are measuring instruments and do not perform automatic controlling or regulating functions.2. Applicability of Previous Rulings and Decisions on the Current Applications:The applicant had previously imported similar measuring instruments, which were classified under Heading 90.32 by the original authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the applicant argued that the current applications involve different products and that each item must be evaluated on its own merits. The Authority agreed, stating that the pending appeal before the Tribunal pertains to different products and that rejecting the current applications solely based on the previous dispute would defeat the purpose of advance rulings. The Authority emphasized that the advance ruling process is facilitative and not a dispute settlement mechanism.3. Evaluation of Expert Opinions and Their Relevance:The applicant provided expert opinions from the Fluid Control Research Institute and the Institute of Chemical Technology, supporting the classification of the flowmeters under Heading 90.26. The jurisdictional customs authorities raised doubts about the relevance and validity of these opinions, considering their age and the possibility of changes in specifications. The applicant clarified that the expert opinions were submitted to assess the functionalities of the instruments and that the Promass flowmeters have remained functionally the same. The Authority found merit in the applicant's contention and noted that the expert opinions, while not the sole basis for classification, provided additional support for the applicant's arguments.4. Admissibility of Applications for Advance Ruling:The jurisdictional Commissionerate suggested that the applications were not fit for advance rulings due to the pending appeal involving similar products. However, the Authority determined that the applications were admissible, as the pending appeal did not involve the specific products covered in the current applications. The Authority reiterated that the advance ruling process aims to provide clarity on entry tax liabilities prior to import or export and should not be hindered by unrelated disputes.Conclusion:Based on the detailed analysis, the Authority concluded that the flowmeters listed in the applications merit classification under Heading 90.26 and more specifically under sub-heading 9026 10 10 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Authority emphasized that the classification should be based on the state of the goods at the time of import and that the flowmeters, as imported, are measuring instruments without automatic controlling or regulating functions.
TaxTMI 