TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, for fixing the special rate of value addition under Notification No. 1/2010-CE, the refunded excise duty was required to be excluded from the duty component while computing actual value addition; (ii) Whether outward freight was deductible from the sale value for the purpose of the notification.
Issue (i): Whether, for fixing the special rate of value addition under Notification No. 1/2010-CE, the refunded excise duty was required to be excluded from the duty component while computing actual value addition.
Analysis: The notification contemplated computation of actual value addition on the basis of the financial records and required the sale value to be taken after excluding excise duty, VAT and other indirect taxes. The refund mechanism under the area-based exemption was only a method to implement the exemption and was not to be treated as value addition. The duty paid through PLA and later refunded represented the exempted portion of duty and had to be kept of the computation of actual value addition.
Conclusion: The refunded excise duty had to be deducted while arriving at actual value addition, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether outward freight was deductible from the sale value for the purpose of the notification.
Analysis: The sales were on FOR destination basis and the records showed that freight and insurance were borne by the seller. In such a situation, the freight formed part of the sale value and could not be excluded. The place-of-removal reasoning under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 did not support deduction of outward freight on these facts.
Conclusion: Outward freight was includible in the sale value, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders rejecting refund were set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: In area-based exemption schemes, amounts refunded as part of the exemption mechanism are to be excluded from the duty component used in computing actual value addition, and freight is not deductible where the sale is on FOR destination basis and the seller bears transportation and insurance costs.
TaxTMI 
