Tribunal rules in favor of US company in tax dispute on technical services & software license fees

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a US-based company, in a tax dispute regarding the chargeability of fees for technical services and software license fees. The Tribunal held that the amount received for technical services did not constitute fees for technical services under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the USA as the services provided were supervisory and did not involve the transfer of technical knowledge. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the software license fees were not taxable as royalties under the DTAA as they did not involve parting with copyright. Therefore, both amounts were held to be not chargeable to tax.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Chargeability of Rs. 52,73,977 as 'Fees for Technical Services'.
2. Taxability of Software License Fees amounting to Rs. 65,28,405.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Chargeability of Rs. 52,73,977 as 'Fees for Technical Services':

The assessee, a US-based company, filed a return of income declaring Nil income, claiming no Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee received Rs. 1,69,29,769 for 'Provision of Design and Engineering services'. Out of this, Rs. 52,73,977 received from Tata Technologies Limited (TTL) for services to Tata Motors Limited (TML) was construed as fees for technical services. The assessee contended that it did not 'make available' any technical knowledge, experience, or skill, thus falling outside the ambit of taxation under Article 12(4) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and USA. The AO and the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) disagreed, treating the amount as 'fees for technical services/fees for included services' and included it in the total income.

The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the transaction, noting that TTL was engaged by TML for engineering services related to vehicle development. The Project Variation Request (PVR) indicated that the assessee provided manpower support (one Project Engineer and one Design Lead) for the project. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the assessee were predominantly supervisory, ensuring timely delivery and issue resolution, and did not 'make available' any technical knowledge or skill for future use by TTL or TML. Thus, the services did not fall under 'Fees for Included Services' as per Article 12(4) of the DTAA. Since the assessee had no PE in India, the amount could not be considered as Business profits under Article 7. Consequently, the Rs. 52,73,977 was not chargeable to tax.

2. Taxability of Software License Fees amounting to Rs. 65,28,405:

The AO observed that the assessee, a distributor of software licenses, acquired software packages from third parties and sold them to TTL, which in turn sold them to Indian customers. The AO treated the sale of software licenses as Royalty under the Act and the DTAA, relying on various judicial decisions. The DRP upheld this view.

The Tribunal referred to Article 12 of the DTAA, which defines 'Royalties' as payments for the use or right to use any copyright. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, which distinguished between ownership of copyright and ownership of the physical material embodying the copyrighted work. The Supreme Court held that transactions allowing end-users to access and use software without exclusive rights do not constitute parting with copyright.

Applying this precedent, the Tribunal found that the Rs. 65,28,405 received by the assessee was for the sale of software licenses, not for parting with copyright. Therefore, the amount did not qualify as 'Royalties' under Article 12 of the DTAA and was not taxable.

Conclusion:

The appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal ruling that neither the Rs. 52,73,977 for technical services nor the Rs. 65,28,405 for software license fees were chargeable to tax. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 21st December 2021.

---