Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (1) TMI 74 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Decisions on Deficit Carry Forward and Undisclosed Income Deletion The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s decisions on both issues. The ITAT confirmed that the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Decisions on Deficit Carry Forward and Undisclosed Income Deletion

                            The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s decisions on both issues. The ITAT confirmed that the assessee can carry forward the deficit to subsequent years and that the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- as undisclosed income was rightly deleted due to the absence of incriminating material. The ITAT dismissed all appeals of the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)'s rulings. Judgments were pronounced on 25.11.2021.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Carry forward of the deficit (excess of expenditure over income) to subsequent years.
                            2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- as undisclosed income.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Carry Forward of the Deficit to Subsequent Years:

                            The primary issue is whether the assessee is eligible to carry forward the deficit (excess of expenditure over income) to subsequent years and set it off against the income of those years. The assessee, a trust registered under section 12A, filed returns declaring nil income. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the carry forward of losses and set off against subsequent years' income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] allowed the appeal, citing several judicial precedents.

                            The CIT(A) relied on the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's decision in CIT vs. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (264 ITR 110), which held that excess expenditure in earlier years can be adjusted against the income of subsequent years, treating it as an application of income for charitable purposes. This view was supported by other judicial decisions, including those of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and various High Courts, which consistently allowed the carry forward of deficits for charitable trusts.

                            The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the issue is squarely covered by judicial precedents, including the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT vs. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection and the Supreme Court's dismissal of the department's SLP against this decision. The ITAT confirmed that the assessee is eligible to set off losses brought forward from previous years and carry forward the deficit to subsequent years.

                            2. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- as Undisclosed Income:

                            The second issue pertains to the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- made by the AO as undisclosed income. The AO contended that the amount paid by Shri Ajay G. Rai for using the assessee's stadium was diverted to another entity, M/s. D.Y. Patil Hospital and Research Centre, and should be treated as the assessee's income. The assessee argued that the payment was a corpus donation with specific directions for its use, and thus, it should not be treated as general income.

                            The CIT(A) deleted the addition, observing that the assessment for A.Y. 2013-14 was completed before the search, making it an unabated assessment. The CIT(A) held that no addition could be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the search. The CIT(A) cited several judicial precedents, including the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's decision in CIT vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation (374 ITR 645), which held that in unabated assessments, additions can only be made based on incriminating material found during the search.

                            The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the AO had no jurisdiction to make additions in an unabated assessment year without incriminating material. The tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had passed a reasoned order following established judicial principles, and thus, there was no infirmity in the deletion of the addition.

                            Conclusion:

                            The ITAT dismissed all the appeals of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The tribunal confirmed that the assessee is eligible to carry forward the deficit to subsequent years and that the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- as undisclosed income was rightly deleted in the absence of incriminating material. The judgments were pronounced in the open court on 25.11.2021.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found