Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Invalid Assessment Order Issued to Non-Existent Entity Nullified</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to the procedural irregularity of issuing the final assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity ... Assessment against amalgamating company - HELD THAT:- We find the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki India Limited [2019 (7) TMI 1449 - SUPREME COURT] by following its own order in batch of Civil Appeals, the lead appeal being Spice Infotainment [2011 (8) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT] has held that the assessment in the name of a company which has been amalgamated and dissolved is null and void. Hon’ble Supreme Court held the passing of assessment order against the amalgamating company is a substantive illegality and not a procedural violation of the nature adverted to in Section 292B of the Act. In this case, final assessment order has been passed dated 27.03.2021 in the name of Trizetto Services India Private Limited which has ceased to exist as per Scheme of amalgamation w.e.f. 01 April, 2018 and as has been certified by Confirmation order of Scheme of Amalgamation by Regional Director (SR) dated 06.09.2019, Chennai. All these information was intimated by the assessee to the Department vide letter (supra.) at various offices i.e. the office of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7, Pune dated 1st November, 2019 and also filed at the office of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, IT, Pune dated 4th November, 2019. In spite of these efforts by the assessee for properly intimating the department about the amalgamation and regarding the fact that Trizetto Services has been amalgamated with CTS India and has ceased to exist, still the Department had passed the final assessment order in the name of Trizetto Services. Therefore, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court (supra.), the assessment in the name of a company which has been amalgamated and dissolved has to be declared null and void. Issues Involved:1. Delay in filing the appeal.2. Legal issue regarding the procedural irregularity in the issuance of the final assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity.Detailed Analysis:1. Delay in Filing the Appeal:The appeal was time-barred by 75 days. The assessee’s counsel cited the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s directions in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020, dated 8th March 2021, which considered the COVID-19 situation and prevailing limitations. The delay was attributed to the pandemic, and it was neither deliberate nor intentional. The Revenue did not object to the condonation. The Tribunal, abiding by the Supreme Court’s directions, condoned the delay, finding it justified under the circumstances.2. Procedural Irregularity in Issuance of Final Assessment Order:The core legal issue was whether the final assessment order passed in the name of TriZetto Services India Private Limited, which had ceased to exist due to amalgamation, was valid. The assessee had informed the Department of the amalgamation with Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited (CTS India) effective from 1st April 2018, as sanctioned by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Despite this, the Department issued the draft and final assessment orders in the name of the non-existent TriZetto Services.The Tribunal noted the following key points:- The amalgamation was effective from 1st April 2018, and TriZetto Services ceased to exist thereafter.- The Department was duly informed via a letter dated 25th October 2019, and the information was acknowledged by various tax offices.- The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) acknowledged the amalgamation but directed the Assessing Officer to mention the present and former names of the company in the final assessment order, which was not followed.The Tribunal referred to the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s rulings in Maruti Suzuki India Limited and Spice Infotainment, which held that an assessment order passed in the name of a non-existent entity due to amalgamation is null and void, constituting a substantive illegality, not a procedural violation under Section 292B of the Act.Judgment:The final assessment order dated 27th March 2021, issued in the name of TriZetto Services India Private Limited, was declared null and void. The Tribunal quashed the order, allowing the assessee’s appeal on this legal ground. Consequently, other grounds of appeal were rendered academic and not addressed.Conclusion:The appeal was allowed, and the final assessment order was quashed due to the procedural irregularity of issuing it in the name of a non-existent entity post-amalgamation. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal principles regarding the validity of assessment orders in cases of corporate amalgamations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found