TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Dispensation of Shareholders & Creditors Meetings in Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act</h1> The National Company Law Tribunal allowed the application under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking dispensation of meetings of ... Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation - Seeking to dispense with the meeting of Shareholders and Creditors in relation to the Transferor Companies, dispensing with the meeting of Shareholders of the Transferee Company and convening the meeting Unsecured Creditors and dispensing the meeting of Secured Creditors of the Transferee Company - Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 - HELD THAT:- It is seen from the record that the Board of Directors of the Applicant Companies vide separate meetings held on 31.05.2021 have approved the proposed 'Scheme of Amalgamation'. Since there are no Secured Creditors in any of the Applicant Companies. Therefore, the requirement of convening their meeting does not arise - That more than 90% in value' of unsecured creditor of all Transferor Companies have given 'no objection' to the Scheme on respective affidavits. Therefore, the requirement of convening the Meetings of Unsecured Creditors in respect of all the Transferor Companies is dispensed with. Application allowed. Issues: Application under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 seeking dispensation of meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation involving multiple companies.In this judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, the Application No. C.A.(CAA)79/ND/2021 was filed under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The application sought to dispense with the meetings of shareholders and creditors concerning the Transferor and Transferee Companies in relation to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. The Scheme was intended to be effective from the Appointed Date of 01.01.2021. The Applicant Companies included Howzat Games Private Limited, Pepperpotts Developers Private Limited, Jeu Electronique Software Private Limited as Transferor Companies, and Junglee Games India Private Limited as the Transferee Company. The Board of Directors of the Applicant Companies had approved the Scheme in meetings held on 31.05.2021. The Scheme aimed at various advantages, including designing and developing software, managing online gaming platforms, and providing consultancy services in the field of computer games programming. The Applicant Companies confirmed that they were not under any prosecution/investigation/inquiry under the Companies Act, 2013, and their Accounting Standards were in conformity with the Act. They had also submitted their Memorandum of Association, Articles of Association, and latest Balance Sheets.Regarding the consent of shareholders and creditors, all shareholders of the Applicant Companies had given their no objection to the Scheme through respective affidavits, eliminating the need for convening shareholder meetings. However, the consent of Unsecured Creditors of the Transferee Company had not been obtained. Therefore, a separate meeting of the Unsecured Creditors of the Transferor Companies was to be convened through Video Conferencing. The details of the quorum, time, and date of the meeting were specified, along with the appointment of a Chairman and a scrutinizer for the meeting. The notice of the meetings was to be sent well in advance, and advertisements were to be published in newspapers. Voting on the proposed Scheme was to be allowed in person, with the Chairman responsible for reporting the results within 7 days. The Transferor Company was directed to serve notices to relevant authorities, and objections were to be raised within a stipulated timeframe. The Chairman's Report was to be filed with the Tribunal within 7 days of the meeting's conclusion. As there were no Secured Creditors in any of the Applicant Companies, their meeting requirement was deemed unnecessary. Additionally, since more than 90% in value of unsecured creditors had given their no objection to the Scheme, the need for convening meetings of Unsecured Creditors for all Transferor Companies was dispensed with. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the Application in the specified terms.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
