Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's total income for the assessment year could be sustained at the full amount declared during survey, or whether the addition had to be restricted on a proportionate basis having regard to the period covered by the previous year and the material available.
Analysis: The assessee had made a declaration during survey under section 133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and had honoured that declaration for the earlier assessment year, but not for the assessment year in question. The Tribunal accepted that the statement recorded during survey was relevant and that the surrounding facts, including unrecorded cash receipts and cash expenditure on house construction, could not be ignored. At the same time, the survey had occurred after only part of the previous year had elapsed, and there was no incriminating material for the later part of the year beyond the survey statement. The Tribunal therefore applied a proportionate and fair estimate, separating the period up to the survey date from the period thereafter.
Conclusion: The addition could not be sustained at the full amount of Rs. 50 lakhs. The income was to be estimated at Rs. 25,96,623, resulting in only partial relief to the assessee.