Tribunal orders fresh adjudication, stresses cash book verification, avoids double addition. Appeal partly allowed.

The Tribunal set aside the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for verifying the cash book and ensuring no double addition occurs. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Legality of the CIT (A)'s order.
2. Addition of Rs. 60,10,250/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Alleged double addition of Rs. 28,06,000/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of the CIT (A)'s Order:

The assessee contended that the order passed by the CIT (A) was against the principles of law, equity, and justice. The CIT (A) upheld the additions made by the AO, which the assessee argued were based on incorrect factual matrices and lacked proper verification.

2. Addition of Rs. 60,10,250/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The AO initially framed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, making an addition of Rs. 10 lakh under Section 68. Subsequently, the Principal CIT invoked Section 263, identifying unverified unrecorded cash expenditures of Rs. 60,10,250/- based on a loose paper document found during a survey.

The assessee claimed these expenditures were for land acquisition and related activities, funded from available cash balances that were omitted from the books but later recorded post-survey. The AO, however, did not accept this explanation, noting discrepancies in the cash book and the timing of the expenditures. The AO treated the entire amount as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C.

The CIT (A) upheld this addition, citing the lack of evidence linking the expenditures to recorded cash withdrawals and the director's admission during the survey that these were unaccounted expenditures.

3. Alleged Double Addition of Rs. 28,06,000/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The assessee argued that the amount of Rs. 28,06,000/- was added twice: once as part of the total Rs. 60,10,250/- and again separately. The CIT (A) dismissed this contention, maintaining that the expenditures were unaccounted and thus rightly added under Section 69C.

Tribunal's Findings:

The Tribunal noted the survey revealed a significant discrepancy between the recorded cash and physical cash available. The assessee explained this by citing an advance given to Shri Hanuba and unrecorded expenditures, which were later accounted for in an updated cash book. The Tribunal emphasized the need for verification of whether sufficient cash was available in the books when the expenditures were incurred.

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument regarding the double addition of Rs. 28,06,000/-. It stated that treating the entire Rs. 60,10,250/- as unexplained expenditure should preclude a separate addition for the same amount, as it would result in double taxation.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for verifying the cash book and ensuring no double addition occurs. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order Pronounced:

The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced in the court on 25/11/2021 at Ahmedabad.

---