Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs accurate TDS credit verification and grants additional credit without remand report</h1> <h3>K.S. Rao & Co. (formerly K.S. Rao & company) Chartered Accountants Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-6 (1), Hyderabad</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the correctness of TDS details reflected in Form 26AS ... Disallowance of credit for TDS - addition confirmed by CIT while processing the return of income by CPC under section 143(1) of the Act and thereafter passing the order under section 154 - HELD THAT:- While passing the order under section 154 of the Act, the CPC has denied the TDS credit for an amount of ₹ 1,54,213/- but no reason is assigned for non granting the credit of the said amount. CIT(A) though accepted this fact that the CPC has not given any reason for not allowing the credit of the said amount and accordingly directed the CPC to allow the total TDS credit ₹ 11,06,643/- instead of ₹ 9,52,430/- allowed in the rectification order passed under section 154 CIT(A) has directed the assessee to provide the information for the purpose of implementing the directions issued to the CPC. Thus, it is manifest from the impugned order that the CIT(A), instead of getting relevant details and facts verified by calling a remand report from the Assessing Officer, has directed the CPC to consider the issue and allow the claim. Since the assessee has claimed that the relevant details were filed in the proceedings under section 154 of the Act as well as before the CIT(A) therefore, in the interest of justice, we set aside this issue to the record of the Assessing Officer to verify the relevant details and correctness of the claim of the assessee regarding the TDS credit. The Assessing Officer has to properly verify the details of TDS as reflected in Form 26AS and then allow the TDS credit to the assessee after giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee - Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Issues:1. Disallowance of credit for TDS of Rs. 80,951 confirmed by CIT(A) out of Rs. 1,71,360 while processing the return of income.Analysis:The appeal revolves around the disallowance of credit for TDS of Rs. 80,951 out of Rs. 1,71,360 confirmed by the CIT(A) during the assessment year 2017-18. The assessee, a partnership firm of Chartered Accountants, filed its return of income, which was processed by CPC under section 143(1). The CPC accepted the declared income but made an adjustment for tax payable by the assessee, resulting in a shortfall credit for TDS and an adjustment of Rs. 4,88,679. The assessee filed a rectification application under section 154, which was disposed of by the CPC. Subsequently, the assessee appealed to the CIT(A) challenging the adjustment and contending that the TDS credit was not granted accurately, leading to a demand of Rs. 1,71,360.The learned AR of the assessee argued before the Tribunal that all details of gross receipts and TDS deducted were provided, as reflected in Form 26AS. He highlighted previous years where similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee by the CIT(A). The AR urged the Assessing Officer to verify the correctness of the TDS deducted from the receipts and reflected in Form 26AS to allow the tax credit. On the contrary, the learned DR contended that the TDS claim did not match the department's data system, and credit was granted only for the amount available in the system. The DR relied on the CIT(A)'s orders to support this stance.Upon considering the submissions and evidence, the Tribunal observed discrepancies in the TDS credit granted by the CPC without providing a reason for denial of a specific amount. The CIT(A) acknowledged this lapse and directed the CPC to allow the total TDS credit of Rs. 11,06,643 instead of the initial Rs. 9,52,430. However, the CIT(A) did not call for a remand report from the Assessing Officer to verify the facts but instructed the CPC to consider and allow the claim. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer to verify the correctness of TDS details reflected in Form 26AS and grant the credit after a proper verification process and hearing to the assessee.In conclusion, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for accurate verification and granting of TDS credit in accordance with the provided details and records.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found