Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the presence of clause 16(2) of the GCC barring interest on earnest money, security deposit, and amounts payable to the contractor under the contract, the arbitral tribunal could award pendente lite and future interest on the amounts found due to the contractor.
Analysis: Clause 16(2) expressly provided that no interest would be payable upon the earnest money, the security deposit, or amounts payable to the contractor under the contract. The Court held that the expression "amounts payable to the contractor under the contract" was wide and operated independently, and could not be confined by ejusdem generis. Relying on Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the binding line of authority, the Court concluded that where the contract contains a clear bar on payment of interest, the arbitrator has no power to award pre-reference, pendente lite, or future interest contrary to that bargain.
Conclusion: The contractor was not entitled to pendente lite or future interest, and the arbitral award of such interest was unsustainable.