Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2021 (11) TMI 609 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Operational Debt Claim, Initiates Insolvency Resolution Process The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor owed an operational debt to the Operational Creditor, as evidenced by the outstanding amount claimed. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds Operational Debt Claim, Initiates Insolvency Resolution Process

                          The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor owed an operational debt to the Operational Creditor, as evidenced by the outstanding amount claimed. Disputes raised by the Corporate Debtor were deemed hypothetical, and the Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was considered maintainable. Mr. Dhanshyam Kantilal Patel was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, and a Moratorium was declared. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commenced, with the Tribunal directing communication of the order to the parties and the IRP.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Whether there exists an operational debt owed by the Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor.
                          2. Whether there is a pre-existing dispute between the parties that would bar the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
                          3. Whether the Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is maintainable.
                          4. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and declaration of Moratorium.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Existence of Operational Debt:

                          The Petitioner, M/s. Infobay Interactive India Private Limited (Operational Creditor), entered into an agreement with the Respondent, M/s. Clear Channel India Private Limited (Corporate Debtor), on 08.08.2014 for exclusive advertisement rights. The Corporate Debtor initially made timely payments but later defaulted. A revised agreement on 09.03.2016 terminated the previous agreement and allowed both parties to compete freely. The Petitioner claimed an outstanding amount of Rs. 1,07,23,700 plus interest Rs. 55,27,734, totaling Rs. 1,62,51,434. The Petitioner issued a demand notice on 19.02.2019, which was not settled by the Corporate Debtor. The Petitioner proposed Mr. Dhanshyam Patel as the IRP, who consented to act in this role.

                          2. Pre-Existing Dispute:

                          The Corporate Debtor argued that there was no operational debt and that significant sums were owed to them by the Petitioner. They cited serious disputes existing prior to the demand notice and claimed that the Petitioner breached the terms of the revised agreement. The Corporate Debtor alleged that a former employee, Mr. Jerald Stephen, colluded with the Petitioner, causing a loss of Rs. 2.30 crore. However, the Tribunal found no evidence supporting these allegations and noted that the disputes were hypothetical and illusory. The Corporate Debtor had also deducted and paid TDS for three invoices, indicating acknowledgment of the debt.

                          3. Maintainability of the Petition:

                          The Respondent contended that the Petition was not maintainable due to the absence of an operational debt and pre-existing disputes. They also raised issues regarding the stamping of the agreements and the absence of an affidavit and financial institution certificate as required by Section 9(3) of the IBC. The Tribunal found that the Petitioner had provided sufficient evidence of the debt and that the disputes raised by the Corporate Debtor were not genuine. The Tribunal also noted that the deducted TDS on invoices indicated the availing of services by the Corporate Debtor.

                          4. Appointment of IRP and Declaration of Moratorium:

                          The Tribunal appointed Mr. Dhanshyam Kantilal Patel as the IRP and declared a Moratorium as per Section 13 read with Section 15 of the IBC. The Moratorium prohibits the institution of any suits or parallel proceedings and the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor's assets until the completion of the Insolvency Resolution process. The IRP is to perform duties as defined under Section 18 of the IBC and report progress within 30 days.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor was in default of a debt due and payable, exceeding the minimum amount stipulated under Section 4(1) of the IBC. The Petition under Section 9 was admitted, and the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commenced from the date of the order. The Registry was directed to communicate the order to both parties and the IRP immediately.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found