Unexplained cash credit fails where loan creditors prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness; related interest disallowance also falls.

Where unsecured loan creditors respond in remand proceedings and the assessee produces confirmations, bank statements, returns and ledger accounts, the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions are treated as established. On that record, an addition for unexplained cash credits cannot be sustained merely on an uncorroborated allegation of accommodation entries or an entry operator. The consequential interest disallowance also falls once the principal loan addition is deleted, including interest attributable to the opening loan balance. The revenue's challenge therefore fails where the documentary and financial evidence supports the loan transactions.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the deletion of addition made under section 68 on account of unsecured loans was justified; (ii) Whether the deletion of the corresponding interest disallowance was justified.

Issue (i): Whether the deletion of addition made under section 68 on account of unsecured loans was justified.

Analysis: The creditor companies had responded in remand proceedings, and the assessee had produced confirmations, bank statements, returns and ledger accounts. The financial statements showed substantial share capital and reserves and surplus, which supported their capacity to advance the loans. The material relied upon by the Assessing Officer did not bring any corroborative defect sufficient to dislodge the finding that the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions stood established. Mere reference to an alleged entry operator, without showing that he controlled the creditor companies or routed the funds, was insufficient to sustain the addition.

Conclusion: The deletion of the addition under section 68 was upheld and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the deletion of the corresponding interest disallowance was justified.

Analysis: Once the unsecured loan additions were held unsustainable, the interest paid on those loans could not survive as an unexplained item. The deletion of the principal additions necessarily supported deletion of the interest addition as well, including the interest relatable to the opening loan balance.

Conclusion: The deletion of the interest addition was upheld and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge failed because the loan creditors' creditworthiness and the genuineness of the loan transactions were accepted on the record, and the consequential interest addition also did not survive.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee establishes the creditors' identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness through reliable financial and documentary evidence, an addition under section 68 cannot be sustained merely on an uncorroborated suspicion of accommodation entries, and the corresponding interest addition also falls with the principal addition.

---