Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the committee of creditors approving liquidation with the requisite voting share and the resolution professional moving the application, the corporate debtor should be ordered into liquidation under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The application was supported by the resolution professional's report that the committee of creditors had resolved, by more than the statutory threshold, to liquidate the corporate debtor. The record also reflected that the corporate debtor had no available assets or plant and machinery and that its business had remained closed for a substantial period, making continuation of the corporate insolvency resolution process unfeasible. In these circumstances, the statutory conditions for liquidation under Section 33(2) stood satisfied. Consequential directions were issued for appointment of the proposed liquidator, publication of the liquidation announcement, intimation to the Registrar of Companies and tax authorities, cessation of the earlier moratorium, commencement of moratorium under liquidation, and filing of the preliminary report in terms of the liquidation regulations.
Conclusion: Liquidation of the corporate debtor was ordered and the proposed insolvency professional was appointed as liquidator.