TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Penalty Order Stayed by Bombay HC under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>Ronnie Mehta Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 19</h3> The Bombay HC stayed the operation of a penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was admitted, and a substantial ... Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - substantial question of law - HELD THAT:- Appeal is admitted and substantial question of is law is framed. Penalty amount is paid, no demand is pending against assessee In the circumstances, pending consideration of appeal we deem it appropriate to stay operation of the impugned order in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus - “(a) That the operation of the impugned order dated 3/8/2016 (Exhibit-K) be stayed pending the present appeal is finally heard and disposed off.”. Interim application is accordingly disposed of in aforesaid terms. Interim application is accordingly disposed of'. Interim application is accordingly disposed of. The Bombay High Court stayed the operation of an impugned order dated 3rd August, 2016 related to a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal has been admitted and a substantial question of law has been framed. The applicant has paid the penalty amount, and no demand is pending against the assessee. The court deemed it appropriate to stay the operation of the impugned order pending the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
