Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for assessment under Item 34 of the Central Excise Tariff, the value of specialised material handling equipment fitted to motor vehicle chassis, including the steel body used for tipping and handling materials, was liable to be excluded from the assessable value.
Analysis: The Explanation below Item 34 provided that where a motor vehicle was mounted, fitted or fixed with weight lifting, earth moving or similar specialised material handling equipment, such equipment other than the chassis was not to be taken into account. On the facts, the tipper mechanism and allied fittings constituted specialised material handling equipment, and the use of the vehicle for transporting loads did not justify inclusion of that equipment in the assessable value. The steel body forming the container for moving and handling materials was also part of the tipping arrangement and could not be treated differently for valuation purposes.
Conclusion: The value of the specialised material handling equipment, including the steel body, was not includible in the assessable value under Item 34, and the contrary orders were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The revision applications succeeded and the impugned appellate orders were set aside with consequential relief to the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: For valuation under a tariff entry excluding specialised material handling equipment, the equipment fitted to a motor vehicle must be left out of assessable value even if the vehicle is also used for transport, provided the equipment answers the description in the exclusion clause.