Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee's Appeal Allowed for Re-examination of Deductions</h1> <h3>Shree Venkatrammana Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. Versus The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur.</h3> Shree Venkatrammana Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. Versus The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.2. Eligibility of interest income for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:1. Denial of Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):The primary issue was whether the authorities were justified in denying the claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessee, a co-operative society providing credit facilities to its members, filed its return of income claiming this deduction. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the society earned income from nominal/associate members, which constituted a majority of its income. Citing the Supreme Court's decision in Citizen Co-op Society Ltd., the AO denied the deduction, asserting that the assessee provided credit facilities to three categories of members (regular, associate, and nominal), thereby violating the principle of mutuality. The CIT(A) upheld this view, noting that the society had admitted excess nominal/associate members, violating the Karnataka Co-operative Society Act, 1959. Consequently, the CIT(A) concluded that the assessee was not entitled to the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).Upon appeal, the Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. CIT, which held that the term 'Members' in section 80P(2)(a)(i) should be construed in light of the definition in the relevant co-operative societies Act. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO for re-examination in light of this judgment, allowing the grounds for statistical purposes.2. Eligibility of Interest Income for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d):The second issue was whether the interest income earned by the assessee was eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The AO had denied this deduction, treating the interest income received from deposits in banks as 'income from other sources.' The CIT(A) upheld this view, relying on the Karnataka High Court's decision in Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd.The Tribunal referenced a coordinate bench's decision in Potters Cottage Industrial Co-Operative Society Ltd., which had dealt with a similar issue. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court in Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. had held that income from surplus funds invested in banks was taxable under 'income from other sources' and not eligible for deduction under section 80P. However, the Karnataka High Court in Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. distinguished this by stating that interest income from deposits made in nationalized banks, used for providing credit facilities to members, was attributable to the business of the society and thus eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).The Tribunal also noted a subsequent Karnataka High Court decision in Pr.CIT vs. Totagars Co-Operative Sale Society, which held that interest income from investments in banks, not being a co-operative society, was not deductible under section 80P(2)(d). However, interest earned from investments in co-operative societies was eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the AO to verify the interest earned from investments in co-operative societies and consider the claim for deduction accordingly.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the issues concerning the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and the eligibility of interest income for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) in light of the relevant judicial precedents. The order was pronounced in the open court on 31st August 2021.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found