Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the summoning order and complaint proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 were liable to be quashed on the ground that the cheque was post-dated and allegedly not issued towards a legally enforceable debt, and whether the applicant could be permitted to seek compounding of the offence.
Analysis: The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the summoning order and the complaint proceedings. The defence that the cheque was post-dated and not issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt was held to be unavailable at that stage in view of the statutory presumptions under Sections 139 and 140 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and such defence could only be examined during trial. At the same time, Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 makes the offence compoundable, and the Court directed that if an application for compounding was moved within ten days, the trial court should decide it in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The prayer to quash was not accepted, but limited relief was granted by permitting the applicant to move for compounding and by directing that no coercive arrest be made for ten days.