Tribunal ruling on interest & consultancy charges, appeal partially allowed. Deductions permitted up to 31/03/2014.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowance of interest payment of Rs. 1,06,660/-. It partially allowed the appeal concerning the Rs. 45,42,000/- consultancy charges, directing the AO to permit deductions for payments received up to 31st March 2014. The disallowance of the Rs. 15 lakhs claim was upheld. The appeal filing was deemed timely, with the final order pronounced on 14/07/2021.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Confirmation of disallowance of interest payment of Rs. 1,06,660/-.
2. Confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 45,42,000/-.
3. Confirmation of disallowance of claim of Rs. 15 lakhs.
4. Timeliness of the appeal filing.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Confirmation of Disallowance of Interest Payment of Rs. 1,06,660/-:

The Assessee incurred an interest expense of Rs. 1,06,660/- due to the late deposit of TDS, which was claimed as a deductible expense. The Assessee argued that this expense was compensatory and not a tax liability. However, the AO and CIT(A) disallowed the deduction, referencing the Hon'ble Madras High Court decision (239 ITR 435) and the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision (230 ITR 733). The Tribunal upheld this disallowance, stating that the interest on late deposit of TDS is not an expense incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes under Section 37(1) of the Act. It was also considered an infraction of law, and such payments are not deductible.

2. Confirmation of Disallowance of Rs. 45,42,000/-:

The Assessee claimed Rs. 45,42,000/- as marketing consultancy charges paid to M/s Predominant Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. under an agreement dated 28th June 2010. The AO disallowed this as prior period expenses, stating that the Assessee follows a mercantile system of accounting, and such expenses are not allowable. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, noting that the Assessee did not create a provision for this liability in its books of accounts for the relevant period. The Tribunal found that the Assessee's liability to pay consultancy charges arose on receipt of payments from customers, which continued until 20th August 2014. Thus, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction for consultancy charges related to payments received up to 31st March 2014, while disallowing the rest.

3. Confirmation of Disallowance of Claim of Rs. 15 Lakhs:

The Assessee claimed an additional Rs. 15 lakhs as consultancy charges, initially disallowed in AY 2012-13 due to non-deduction of TDS. The AO rejected this claim for AY 2014-15, as it was not included in the Income Tax Return or computation of income for that year. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, noting that the Assessee cannot claim the same expense in two different assessment years. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities, affirming the disallowance of the Rs. 15 lakhs.

4. Timeliness of the Appeal Filing:

The Assessee contended that the appeal was filed within the limitation period as the last date for filing was a holiday. This procedural aspect was acknowledged without further dispute.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal concerning the disallowance of interest payment of Rs. 1,06,660/-. It partially allowed the appeal regarding the Rs. 45,42,000/- consultancy charges, directing the AO to allow deductions for payments received up to 31st March 2014. The disallowance of the Rs. 15 lakhs claim was upheld. The appeal was deemed timely filed. The final order was pronounced in the open court on 14/07/2021.

---