Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-deposit of interim compensation ordered under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 bars the accused from cross-examining the complainant.
Analysis: Interim compensation under Section 143A is payable within the period prescribed by the statute and, if unpaid, may be recovered as if it were a fine under Section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The provision also contemplates adjustment against any fine or compensation ultimately awarded and provides for repayment with interest if the accused is acquitted. These features show that the statutory recovery mechanism is separate from the conduct of the trial. Non-payment of interim compensation does not, by itself, authorise denial of the accused's procedural right to cross-examine the complainant.
Conclusion: The accused cannot be denied cross-examination merely because interim compensation under Section 143A has not been deposited.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the orders of the courts below failed, and the criminal petition was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Non-deposit of interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 does not extinguish the accused's right to cross-examine, since the statute provides a separate recovery mechanism under Section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.