Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate debtor should be put into liquidation on failure of the resolution process and whether a liquidator should be appointed.
Analysis: The resolution process had run its course, the committee of creditors had declined to approve any viable resolution plan, and the extended period for completion of the process had expired. In those circumstances, the statutory conditions for liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 stood satisfied. The Tribunal also accepted the proposal for appointment of the named professional as liquidator and issued consequential directions regarding public announcement, cessation of moratorium, reporting obligations, and intimation to authorities.
Conclusion: The corporate debtor was directed to undergo liquidation and the named liquidator was appointed to conduct the liquidation process.