Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the orders imposing tax and penalty under Section 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on the ground of invoice mismatch and violation of Rule 138 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The impugned orders proceeded on the finding that the particulars in the invoices did not match the verifying sheets available with the mobile squad and that the petitioner had transported the goods in breach of Rule 138. The authorities below also recorded that the act was fraudulent and levied tax and penalty accordingly. No error in those findings was demonstrated in the writ proceedings.
Conclusion: The challenge to the penalty and the appellate rejection failed.