TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT dismisses department's appeals; assessee's appeal allowed on ground rent disallowance. Legal principles upheld.</h1> <h3>Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Central Circle-6, New Delhi And DCIT, Central Circle-6, New Delhi Versus Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.</h3> Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Central Circle-6, New Delhi And DCIT, Central Circle-6, New Delhi Versus Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of Rs. 7,90,230/- on account of replacement fund.2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 93,040/- on account of cessation of liability u/s 41(1)/28.3. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 72,199/- on account of excessive depreciation on printers/UPS.4. Restriction of disallowance of foreign traveling expenses to Rs. 2,00,000/-.5. Allowance of losses amounting to Rs. 18.52 crores in the Dwarka Project.6. Disallowance of Rs. 1,32,355/- u/s 41(1)/28 for A.Y. 2009-10.7. Deletion of disallowance on account of excessive depreciation on printers/UPS for A.Y. 2009-10.8. Disallowance of Rs. 1,38,740/- on account of sale promotion expenses.9. Disallowance of Rs. 15,11,300/- on account of bad debts written off.10. Disallowance of Rs. 10,47,025/- incurred as ground rent on leasehold properties to L&DO.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of Rs. 7,90,230/- on account of replacement fund:The assessee opted not to press the solitary ground raised in its appeal pertaining to the disallowance of Rs. 7,90,230/- on account of replacement fund. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was treated as dismissed.2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 93,040/- on account of cessation of liability u/s 41(1)/28:The department's appeal challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 93,040/- made by the AO on account of cessation of liability. The AO relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v/s T. V. Sundram Iyenger & Sons Ltd., asserting that the liability had ceased to exist. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, referencing the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT Vs. Singauli Sugar Works, which clarified that liabilities shown in audited accounts do not cease to exist merely due to the expiry of the limitation period. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the department's ground of appeal.3. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 72,199/- on account of excessive depreciation on printers/UPS:The AO reduced the depreciation claim on computer peripherals such as printers and UPS, treating them as ordinary plant and machinery items. The CIT(A) allowed the higher depreciation rate as claimed by the assessee, following judgments from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the department's ground of appeal.4. Restriction of disallowance of foreign traveling expenses to Rs. 2,00,000/-:The AO disallowed foreign travel expenses incurred by the wife of one of the directors, considering them personal. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to Rs. 2,00,000/-, acknowledging some personal element but recognizing the business purpose. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the department's ground of appeal.5. Allowance of losses amounting to Rs. 18.52 crores in the Dwarka Project:The AO disallowed the loss claimed by the assessee, deeming it unscientific and estimated. The CIT(A) allowed the loss based on the Percentage of Completion Method (POCM) and Accounting Standard-7. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, recognizing the validity of the accounting method and the business rationale. The department's appeal on this issue was dismissed.6. Disallowance of Rs. 1,32,355/- u/s 41(1)/28 for A.Y. 2009-10:The department's appeal for A.Y. 2009-10 on the issue of disallowance u/s 41(1)/28 was dismissed by the ITAT, following the same reasoning as in A.Y. 2008-09.7. Deletion of disallowance on account of excessive depreciation on printers/UPS for A.Y. 2009-10:The ITAT dismissed the department's appeal for A.Y. 2009-10 on the issue of excessive depreciation on printers/UPS, following the same reasoning as in A.Y. 2008-09.8. Disallowance of Rs. 1,38,740/- on account of sale promotion expenses:The AO disallowed 20% of the sale promotion expenses incurred through directors' personal credit cards, suspecting personal use. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, citing that a company, being an artificial legal entity, cannot incur personal expenses. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the department's appeal.9. Disallowance of Rs. 15,11,300/- on account of bad debts written off:The AO disallowed the write-off of advances given to suppliers, not considering them as bad debts u/s 36(1)(vii). The CIT(A) allowed the write-off as a business loss u/s 28. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing the Supreme Court's judgment in Badridas Daga v/s CIT, dismissing the department's appeal.10. Disallowance of Rs. 10,47,025/- incurred as ground rent on leasehold properties to L&DO:The AO disallowed the ground rent, applying section 43B. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The ITAT, referencing the ITAT's judgment in K. Narendra v/s ACIT, held that section 43B does not apply to ground rent, directing the deletion of the disallowance. The assessee's appeal was allowed.Decision:The ITAT dismissed the department's appeals on all issues and upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, except for the ground rent issue, where the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. The detailed analysis provided comprehensive reasoning for each issue, ensuring adherence to legal principles and accounting standards.
TaxTMI 