Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (7) TMI 1232 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal remands revenue appeal for fresh adjudication, directs examination of shareholders. Commission deletion issue pending. The Tribunal allowed the revenue's appeal, remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to have the assessee ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal remands revenue appeal for fresh adjudication, directs examination of shareholders. Commission deletion issue pending.

                            The Tribunal allowed the revenue's appeal, remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to have the assessee produce the shareholders for examination to prove the genuineness of the transactions. The issue of deletion of Rs. 3 lakhs for commission was not specifically addressed in the Tribunal's order but is likely to be reconsidered during the reassessment process. The decision was made on 27/07/2021.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Deletion of addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act of Rs. 3 crores.
                            2. Deletion of Rs. 3 lakhs on account of commission for obtaining accommodation entries.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deletion of Addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act of Rs. 3 crores:

                            The appeal was filed by the Assessing Officer (AO) against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] who deleted the addition of Rs. 3 crores made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The AO contended that the assessee failed to produce the parties who invested in the company to prove the genuineness of the transaction. Despite multiple notices and summons issued to the parties, none appeared, and the assessee expressed inability to produce them. The AO concluded that the transactions were bogus based on the search conducted on Mr. S.K. Jain, revealing that the assessee was a beneficiary of accommodation entries.

                            The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating that the assessee provided sufficient documentary evidence, including share application forms, confirmations, PAN details, bank statements, and balance sheets of the investor companies. The CIT(A) noted that the AO's independent enquiry did not reveal any adverse information about the shareholders' existence or capacity to invest. The CIT(A) relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT vs. Lovely Export, which held that if the share application money is received from alleged bogus shareholders whose names are given to the AO, the addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee.

                            However, the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not address the AO's requirement for personal examination of the investors, which the assessee failed to comply with. The Tribunal emphasized that the onus under Section 68 shifts between the assessee and the AO and that the assessee, a private limited company, should have been able to produce the shareholders. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's judgment in NRA Iron and Steel Ltd and the Delhi High Court's judgment in NDR Promoters Ltd, which emphasize the necessity of proving the genuineness of transactions and the creditworthiness of investors.

                            The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the assessee to produce the shareholders before the CIT(A), who should either examine them himself or direct the AO to do so. The issue was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee a proper opportunity of hearing.

                            2. Deletion of Rs. 3 lakhs on Account of Commission for Obtaining Accommodation Entries:

                            The AO had also made an addition of Rs. 3 lakhs on account of commission for obtaining accommodation entries, which was deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal's order does not provide specific details or analysis regarding this addition. However, since the Tribunal remanded the main issue of Rs. 3 crores back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, it can be inferred that the related issue of Rs. 3 lakhs commission would also be reconsidered during the reassessment process.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the revenue for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) with directions to the assessee to produce the shareholders for examination. The CIT(A) was instructed to decide the issue afresh, considering the judgments of the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court, and after providing a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The order was pronounced in the open court on 27/07/2021.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found