Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the name of the company struck off from the register of companies was liable to be restored under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 on the basis that it was carrying on business or that it was otherwise just to restore it.
Analysis: The application was founded on material showing incorporation, continuing business activity, audited financial statements, and assets reflected in the latest balance sheet. The Tribunal also considered the Registrar's objection that filings had been defaulted and that the company had been identified for strike off under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. On the record, the Tribunal found that the company was in existence and functioning as a going concern, and that the circumstances justified restoration under Section 252(3). The directions for filing pending documents, payment of costs, and compliance before restoration were treated as consequential conditions attached to the relief.
Conclusion: Restoration of the company's name was allowed and the strike-off action was set aside, subject to compliance with the directions issued by the Tribunal.
Final Conclusion: The company was ordered to be revived in the register of companies, with ancillary compliance requirements and costs imposed as conditions for effective restoration.
Ratio Decidendi: A struck-off company may be restored when the Tribunal is satisfied, on the materials placed, that it was carrying on business or operation at the relevant time or that restoration is otherwise just.