TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal, Directs Reconsideration of Disallowance</h1> <h3>Pragati Glass Private Limited Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir. 1, Station Road, Bharuch</h3> Pragati Glass Private Limited Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir. 1, Station Road, Bharuch - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of provident fund contribution2. Disallowance under section 14A3. Disallowance of various expenses1. Disallowance of Provident Fund Contribution:The appeal was against the disallowance of provident fund contribution due to a delay in depositing employees' contributions. The Assessing Officer disallowed the amount, but the assessee argued that the disallowance was not justified. The Tribunal noted that there were divergent views on the issue among different High Courts. The Finance Act, 2021 amended section 36, impacting the disallowance. The Tribunal decided to restore the issue to the CIT(A) for further consideration, allowing the assessee to present all factual and legal submissions.2. Disallowance under Section 14A:The Assessing Officer made a disallowance under section 14A, alleging that the assessee had earned exempt income. However, the assessee contended that no exempt income was earned during the relevant period and that no expenses were incurred for earning such income. The Tribunal observed that if no exempt income is earned, no disallowance under section 14A can be made. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the entire disallowance under section 14A.3. Disallowance of Various Expenses:The dispute involved the disallowance of various expenses to the extent of 10%. The Assessing Officer had made an ad-hoc disallowance without specific verification, which the CIT(A) reduced to 10%. The Tribunal found that the disallowance was not based on any specific discrepancies and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the entire disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized that ad-hoc disallowances without proper reasoning are impermissible. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal announcing the order during a virtual court hearing.
TaxTMI 