Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cutting imported billets into smaller pieces for local sale amounts to manufacture or processing so as to deny refund under Notification No. 102/2007-C dated 14.09.2007.
Analysis: The imported goods were only cut into smaller sizes for marketing and no new product came into existence. The cutting did not alter the identity or character of the goods. The same principle had been applied in earlier decisions holding that mere reduction in size for trade purposes does not amount to manufacture or processing, and the contrary decisions relied on by the Revenue were found distinguishable on facts.
Conclusion: The condition of the notification was not violated and the refund could not be denied on the ground of manufacture or processing.
Final Conclusion: The rejection of the refund claim was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere cutting of imported goods into smaller pieces for sale, without bringing about a new product or change in identity, does not constitute manufacture or processing for denial of refund under the exemption notification.