Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order and the appellate order were liable to be quashed for want of fair hearing and absence of adequate reasons, and whether the matter required fresh adjudication after giving the petitioner an effective opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The assessment was passed ex parte under the State GST regime and the record disclosed no sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to present its case. The order also did not disclose adequate reasons showing how the liability was determined. Since the order entailed civil consequences and was made in breach of the principles of natural justice, the writ court held that interference was warranted notwithstanding the availability of a statutory appeal. The appellate order, being founded on delay, also could not survive once the foundational assessment order was set aside. The court further protected the petitioner by recognizing the deposit already made, directing an additional deposit, and ordering release of the bank attachment so that the dispute could be reconsidered on merits.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order and appellate order were quashed, and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after adequate opportunity of hearing, with ancillary directions for deposit, de-freezing of the bank account, and expeditious disposal.