High Court suspends Lookout Circular, allowing travel with conditions, warns against non-compliance. The High Court suspended the Lookout Circular until 30.06.2021, allowing the petitioner to travel to specific countries from 27.04.2021 onwards under ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court suspends Lookout Circular, allowing travel with conditions, warns against non-compliance.
The High Court suspended the Lookout Circular until 30.06.2021, allowing the petitioner to travel to specific countries from 27.04.2021 onwards under strict conditions. The Court emphasized compliance with requirements such as maintaining a fixed deposit, providing travel details, and refraining from interference. Violations would lead to deposit forfeiture. The suspension was based on COVID-19-related circumstances, with a warning against seeking extensions without valid reasons. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.
Issues: - Petitioner seeking permission to travel to Singapore, Malaysia, and United Kingdom by lifting Lookout Circular. - Claim of non-cooperation by respondents due to lack of crucial documents. - Petitioner's overstay abroad due to COVID-19 lockdown. - Special Court order permitting travel abroad. - High Court decision to suspend Lookout Circular till 30.06.2021 with conditions.
Analysis:
The petitioner sought a direction to lift the Lookout Circular to travel to specific countries. The High Court considered the previous writ petition where the petitioner was allowed to travel with conditions. The respondents argued that the petitioner did not cooperate in the investigation, citing lack of crucial documents. However, the petitioner claimed to have submitted the required documents to the second respondent, as evidenced in the complaint filed before the Adjudicating Authority.
The respondents also criticized the petitioner's overstay abroad beyond the permitted period, alleging non-cooperation. The High Court rejected this claim, attributing the overstay to COVID-19-related restrictions and flight unavailability. Notably, the Special Court had previously permitted the petitioner to travel abroad, and both parties requested similar conditions for the current travel. Consequently, the High Court decided to suspend the Lookout Circular until 30.06.2021, enabling the petitioner's travel to the specified countries from 27.04.2021 onwards, subject to stringent conditions.
The High Court emphasized the importance of complying with the specified conditions, including maintaining a substantial fixed deposit, providing travel details, staying in contact with the second respondent, and refraining from interfering with witnesses or evidence. Any violation would result in the forfeiture of the fixed deposit. The Court clarified that the suspension of the Lookout Circular was based on the current circumstances and cautioned against seeking extensions unless due to COVID-19 situations. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.