Tribunal Dismisses Application Against Personal Guarantor for Procedural Non-Compliance

The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code against the personal guarantor due to non-compliance with procedural requirements under Section 95. The applicant was allowed to file a fresh application, emphasizing the significance of following prescribed procedures when initiating insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors.

---

---

Issues:
- Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
- Default in repayment by borrower and invocation of guarantee against personal guarantor.
- Compliance with the procedural requirements under Section 95 of the IBC for filing against personal guarantor.

Analysis:
1. The petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to the Corporate Debtor's inability to repay its financial debt. The Financial Creditor, a Non-Banking Financial Company, provided loan facilities to the Borrower, who later became the Corporate Debtor, with the Corporate Debtor standing as a guarantor for the financial facilities.

2. Despite repeated requests and defaults by the Borrower in repaying the loan, the Financial Creditor recalled the loan facilities and initiated arbitration proceedings, which ruled in favor of the Financial Creditor. The Financial Creditor also invoked Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, against the Corporate Guarantor due to dishonored security cheques.

3. The total outstanding amount due and payable by the Corporate Debtor and the guarantor was calculated, leading to the initiation of the application against the personal guarantor. However, the Tribunal observed that the application was filed under Section 7 of the IBC, not Section 95, which deals with personal guarantors.

4. The Tribunal highlighted the procedural requirements under Section 95 of the IBC, emphasizing the necessity of serving a demand notice and filing an application in Form C against the personal guarantor after the debtor fails to repay the debt within 14 days of the notice. As the demand notice was not served on the personal guarantor in this case, the Tribunal deemed the application as not maintainable and dismissed it.

5. The Tribunal allowed the applicant to file a fresh application in compliance with the provisions of the law, indicating that the dismissal was based on procedural grounds rather than the merits of the case. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the prescribed procedures under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code for initiating insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors.

---