Cheque dishonour cases are primarily compensatory; payment and compounding can justify setting aside imprisonment.

In cheque dishonour proceedings, the court treated Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act as primarily compensatory and noted that the punitive element exists to secure payment. It held that the object of the law is to recover the cheque amount with interest and costs expeditiously, and that offences under the Act are compoundable. Where the accused paid twice the cheque amount with costs and the complainant accepted the payment, the proceedings could be closed and the sentence of imprisonment need not continue. The conviction and imprisonment were therefore set aside after compensation was accepted and the offence was compounded.

---

---

Issues: Whether the conviction and sentence for dishonour of cheque should be interfered with and the sentence of imprisonment set aside in view of payment of compensation and compounding of the offence.

Analysis: Proceedings under Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act are quasi-criminal in nature and are primarily compensatory, with the punitive element operating to enforce payment. The object of Section 138 is to secure the cheque amount with interest and costs expeditiously, and offences under the Act are compoundable. Where the accused tenders twice the cheque amount together with costs and the complainant accepts the same, the proceedings can be closed and the sentence of imprisonment need not be continued.

Conclusion: The conviction and sentence of imprisonment were set aside after acceptance of compensation, and the revision was allowed to that extent in favour of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: In cheque dishonour cases, the compensatory object of the statute can justify closing the proceedings and setting aside imprisonment once the complainant is duly compensated and the offence is compounded.

---