Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants deduction for interest income from co-op banks in assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16</h1> <h3>Food Corporation of India Employees Co-Operative Credit Soc. Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 32 (1) (5), Mumbai</h3> Food Corporation of India Employees Co-Operative Credit Soc. Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 32 (1) (5), Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Eligibility of the assessee to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Eligibility of the assessee to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Eligibility to Claim Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):The primary contention of the assessee was that interest income from fixed deposits and savings bank accounts is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a Co-operative Credit Society, earned interest income from fixed deposits with Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Apna Sahkari Bank Ltd., and from a savings bank account with the State Bank of India. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim, categorizing the interest income as 'Income from other sources.'The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars, Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. vs. ITO, 322 ITR 283 (SC), which held that such interest income is taxable under Section 56 as 'Income from other sources' and does not qualify for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal also cited the Gujarat High Court's decision in State Bank of India vs. CIT, 389 ITR 578, which supported the same view. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the primary contention of the assessee.2. Eligibility to Claim Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d):The alternate contention of the assessee was for allowing deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income on fixed deposits with Co-operative Banks. The Tribunal noted that the issue of whether interest income derived from deposits with co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) has not been conclusively settled.The Tribunal referenced its earlier decision in Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Co-op Society Ltd. vs. ITO, 94 taxmann.com 15 (Mumbai), which held that interest income derived by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank is entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal emphasized that the relevant statutory provision, Section 80P(2)(d), allows for deduction of income by way of interest derived from investments with any other co-operative society.The Tribunal also cited the Pune Bench's decision in Majalgaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. vs. ACIT [2019] 105 taxmann.com 100 (Pune - Trib.), which supported the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest and dividend income derived from investments with co-operative banks.Further, the Tribunal referred to the Karnataka High Court's decision in PCIT vs. Totagars, Cooperative Sale Society 392 ITR 74, which held that for the purpose of Section 80P(2)(d), a co-operative bank should be considered as a co-operative society. The Gujarat High Court in Surat Vankar Sahakari Sangh Ltd. vs. ACIT, 421 ITR 134, also supported this view.However, the Tribunal acknowledged a contrary view by the Karnataka High Court in PCIT vs. Totagars, Co-operative Sale Society 395 ITR 611, which held that interest income from deposits with co-operative banks does not qualify for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). Notably, this later judgment did not consider the earlier decision.In the absence of a jurisdictional High Court decision, the Tribunal followed the principle laid down by the Bombay High Court in K. Subramanian vs. Siemens India Ltd. 156 ITR 11, which prefers the view that favors the assessee when conflicting decisions exist. Thus, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income derived from investments with co-operative banks.Conclusion for Assessment Year 2014-15:The Tribunal dismissed the primary contention under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) but allowed the alternate contention under Section 80P(2)(d), granting the deduction for interest income from co-operative banks.Assessment Year 2015-16:The facts for the assessment year 2015-16 were identical to those of 2014-15, except for the amount of interest earned. Therefore, the Tribunal applied the same findings and allowed the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from co-operative banks.Final Outcome:Both appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, granting the benefit of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned from co-operative banks.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found