Revenue's appeal dismissed by ITAT, confirming CIT(A)'s decisions on unaccounted income. Lack of evidence cited.

The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions. Deletions of additions totaling Rs. 8,17,500/- for unaccounted car parking area sales and Rs. 7,50,00,000/- for unaccounted FSI sale income were affirmed. The additions lacked concrete evidence, being based on assumptions and surmises. The ITAT found the CIT(A)'s findings appropriate and declined to intervene at the appellate stage.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition made on account of unaccounted sales of car parking area.
2. Deletion of addition made on account of unaccounted income on FSI sale.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue No. 1: Deletion of Addition of Rs. 8,17,500/- on Account of Unaccounted Sales of Car Parking Area

The revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 8,17,500/- made on account of unaccounted sales of car parking area. The Assessing Officer (AO) had rejected the books of account under Section 145 of the I.T. Act, 1961, on the grounds that the firm sold parking slots/garages to buyers of flats in Golden Nest Phase XV, which were not included in the sale agreements. The AO based this on seized material, including allotment letters and a hard disk, which indicated that the firm charged Rs. 3,50,000/- for each parking slot. The AO added this amount as 'income from other sources' since the sale of parking was deemed illegal per the Supreme Court's decision in Nahal Chand Lalchand Pvt. Ltd. v Panchal Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. The AO also rejected the assessee’s argument that the parking charges were included in the sale price of the flats and thus accounted for in the books.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleted the addition, relying on the previous assessment year (AY 2012-13) where 99% of the total estimated sales of parking was added by the AO, and only 1% was added in AY 2013-14. The CIT(A) found that the addition made by the AO was based on surmises and conjectures, with no concrete evidence of cash transactions outside the books. The CIT(A) also noted that the assessee had included an amount of Rs. 3,13,30,000/- on account of the sale of parking in the sales account for AY 2013-14. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no change or variation in the facts from the previous year and confirming that the CIT(A) had decided the matter judiciously and correctly.

Issue No. 2: Deletion of Addition of Rs. 7,50,00,000/- on Account of Unaccounted Income on FSI Sale

The revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 7,50,00,000/- made on account of unaccounted income on FSI sale. The AO had based the addition on an unsigned draft agreement found during the search, which mentioned a total sale consideration of Rs. 21.5 crores, whereas the assessee had shown only Rs. 14 crores in the books. The AO inferred that the difference of Rs. 7.5 crores was received in cash.

The CIT(A) examined the seized documents and found that the unsigned agreement was merely a draft and not finalized. The seized ledger and advance tax calculations consistently supported the assessee's claim of a Rs. 14 crore consideration. The CIT(A) noted that there was no corroborative evidence of the Rs. 7.5 crores being paid in cash, and the partner of the assessee firm had reiterated in a statement under Section 132(4) that the deal was not finalized and the amount of Rs. 14 crores was booked tentatively for advance tax purposes.

The CIT(A) concluded that the AO's inference was without evidence and directed the deletion of the addition. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that additions cannot be based on unsigned agreements or assumptions without corroborative evidence. The ITAT also cited various judicial precedents supporting the principle that loose papers or unsigned documents cannot be the sole basis for additions unless corroborated by other evidence.

Conclusion:

The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The deletions of Rs. 8,17,500/- on account of unaccounted sales of car parking area and Rs. 7,50,00,000/- on account of unaccounted income on FSI sale were upheld, as the additions were found to be based on assumptions and conjectures without sufficient evidence. The CIT(A)'s findings were deemed judicious and correct, and the ITAT found no reason to interfere at the appellate stage.

---