Statutory exemption cannot be curtailed by departmental instructions that add conditions absent from the notification.

An exemption notification issued under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not be denied on the basis of departmental instructions issued under Rule 233 requiring the manufacturer to pass on the benefit to buyers or consumers, because the notification itself imposed no such condition. Rule 233 authorised only supplementary instructions and could not alter, abridge, or qualify a statutory exemption. The Court also held that the valuation provision in Section 4(4)(d)(ii) did not justify importing an additional condition into the exemption or treating the duty component in the manner suggested by the department. The denial of exemption was therefore unjustified.

---

---

Issues: Whether exemption granted under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be denied by departmental instructions issued under Rule 233 on the ground that the manufacturer had not passed on the benefit of the exemption to the buyer or consumer, and whether such instructions could qualify or curtail the terms of the exemption notification.

Analysis: The exemption notification did not state that the benefit was available only if the manufacturer passed it on to buyers or consumers. Rule 233 empowered the issue of instructions for supplemental matters, but not for altering, abridging, or qualifying a statutory notification issued under Rule 8. The instructions, by introducing a condition not found in the notification and by affecting the manner of assessment, went beyond permissible administrative guidance. The Court also rejected the argument that the definition of value under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) justified denial of the exemption, holding that the provision did not support adding a part of the excise duty into assessable value in the manner suggested by the department.

Conclusion: The denial of the exemption on the ground that the benefit had not been passed on to the buyer or consumer was unjustified, and the departmental instructions could not be used to defeat the notification.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory exemption notification cannot be restricted or conditioned by non-statutory departmental instructions, and excise valuation provisions cannot be used to introduce a condition absent from the notification.

---