Capital receipt treatment for interest subsidy under an industrial upgradation scheme, with verification remitted for consequential relief.

Interest subsidy under the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme was treated as a capital receipt because the scheme's purpose was industrial upgradation rather than meeting trading operations. The Tribunal noted that the omitted grounds were already covered by the assessee's earlier year decision and, on that basis, accepted the subsidy as outside the tax net for the relevant year. It also referred to the later insertion of section 2(24)(xviii) as consistent with that view. However, because the factual quantum and supporting documents needed verification, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether the omitted grounds relating to interest subsidy under the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme were required to be adjudicated and whether such subsidy was to be treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the assessee's additional grounds had already been held to be covered by the assessee's own earlier year decision and that the interest subsidy was governed by the purpose of the scheme. The subsidy was considered to be granted for industrial upgradation and not for meeting trading operations, so its character was treated as capital in nature. The Tribunal also applied the later legislative insertion in section 2(24)(xviii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as reinforcing the view that such receipts were outside the tax net for the relevant year. Since the factual quantum and supporting documents required verification, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer.

Conclusion: The omitted grounds were treated as covered in favour of the assessee, the subsidy was held to be of capital nature, and the matter was remitted for verification and consequential relief.

---