Tax Tribunal Ruling on Exclusion of Expenses for Export Turnover

The tribunal allowed the assessee's arguments regarding the exclusion of communication expenses from export turnover for deductions under Section 10A and 10B, following the Karnataka High Court precedent. It upheld the headcount method for allocating common expenses among business segments, remanding for verification. The treatment of forex fluctuation losses was remanded for detailed verification. Various comparables were selected and rejected for transfer pricing analysis, with a focus on risk adjustment. The tribunal directed re-computation of the operating margin for Cyber Media Research Limited, emphasizing consistency and detailed verification in its decision. Appeals were partly allowed with specific directions for re-computation and verification by the AO/TPO.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Communication expenses exclusion from export turnover for Section 10A/10B deduction.
2. Methodology for allocating common/indirect costs among business segments.
3. Deduction for forex fluctuation considered capital in nature.
4. Selection and rejection of comparables for transfer pricing analysis.
5. Risk adjustment in transfer pricing.
6. Computation of operating margin for Cyber Media Research Limited.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Communication Expenses Exclusion from Export Turnover:
The assessee argued that communication expenses should not be reduced from export turnover for computing deductions under Section 10A and 10B. The tribunal referenced the Karnataka High Court decision in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Limited, which mandates that if telecommunication expenses are excluded from export turnover, they must also be excluded from total turnover. This principle was applied consistently, and the tribunal allowed this ground in favor of the assessee.

2. Methodology for Allocating Common/Indirect Costs:
The assessee used the headcount method to allocate common expenses among various segments. The tribunal noted that this method was consistently applied in previous years and upheld by the tribunal in ITA No.1510/Bang/2012 and the Karnataka High Court. Despite the DRP's observations of discrepancies in profit margins across segments, the tribunal directed to follow the headcount method consistently and remanded the issue for verification of employee numbers and allocated expenses.

3. Deduction for Forex Fluctuation Considered Capital in Nature:
The DRP observed inconsistencies in the assessee's treatment of forex fluctuation losses as non-operating for the current year, unlike the previous year. The tribunal noted the need for detailed information on forex gains/losses and remanded the issue to the AO/TPO for verification, directing them to follow the tribunal's previous order in IT(TP)A 271/Bang/2014.

4. Selection and Rejection of Comparables for Transfer Pricing Analysis:
The tribunal reviewed the inclusion/exclusion of several comparables for software development and technical support services segments:
- ICRA Techno Analytics Limited, Infosys Limited, KALS Information Systems Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Tata Elxsi Limited: Excluded due to functional dissimilarities and lack of segmental information.
- Acropetal Technologies Limited, Eclerx Services Limited, ICRA Online Limited, Infosys BPO Limited: Excluded for reasons such as high onsite revenue, KPO services, and significant brand value.
- Sundaram Business Services Limited: Included as there was no objection from the assessee.
- Asian Business Exhibition and Conferences Limited: Excluded due to functional differences in organizing exhibitions and conferences.

5. Risk Adjustment in Transfer Pricing:
The tribunal directed the AO/TPO to consider the risk adjustment claimed by the assessee, referencing the methodology used in previous cases such as Philips Software Centre Private Limited and Sony India Pvt Ltd. The tribunal emphasized the need for reasonably accurate adjustments to account for differences in risk profiles.

6. Computation of Operating Margin for Cyber Media Research Limited:
The tribunal remanded the issue to the AO/TPO to re-compute the correct operating margin for Cyber Media Research Limited, directing them to ensure accuracy in the computation.

Conclusion:
The tribunal's decision addressed various issues related to corporate tax and transfer pricing matters, emphasizing consistency with previous rulings and the need for detailed verification of facts. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, and specific directions were given for re-computation and verification by the AO/TPO.

---