Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Corporate restructuring scheme approved by NCLT for three companies under Companies Act 2013</h1> <h3>In Re : MJI Tech Private Limited and Ors.</h3> The National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, sanctioned a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving three companies under Sections ... Sanction of the Composite Scheme of Arrangement - Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 - HELD THAT:- Certificates of the respective statutory auditors of the Petitioner Companies have been placed on record to the effect that the accounting treatment provided for in the Scheme is in conformity with applicable accounting standards notified under Section 133 of the Act. There appears to be no impediment in sanctioning the Scheme which appears to be fair and reasonable and not contrary to public policy or violative of any provisions of law. All the statutory requirements of Sections 230-232 of the Act appear to have been complied with - Petition allowed. Issues involved:Company petition under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for sanction of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving three companies.Detailed Analysis:1. Company Petition and Purpose of the Scheme:The Company Petition was filed under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the sanction of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving three companies - M/s. MJI Tech Private Limited, M/s. VKG Electronics Private Limited, and M/s. Goodre Private Limited. The purpose of the Scheme was to achieve greater efficiency in resource management, cost savings, simplification of business operations, and improvement of organizational functioning through corporate restructuring.2. Background of the Companies Involved:Each of the three companies involved in the Scheme - M/s. MJI Tech Private Limited, M/s. VKG Electronics Private Limited, and M/s. Goodre Private Limited - were described in detail, including their businesses, incorporation details, and registered office addresses.3. Approval of the Scheme:The board of directors of the Transferor Companies 1 & 2, along with the Transferee Company, had approved the Scheme through their respective board resolutions dated 05.07.2018.4. Reports and Observations:The Regional Director and the Official Liquidator filed reports with observations related to compliance with statutory provisions and the conduct of the companies. The Income Tax department also submitted reports emphasizing the need to protect revenue rights during tax assessments post-merger.5. Compliance and Affidavit:The Petitioner Companies confirmed compliance with directions given by the Tribunal and stated in a joint affidavit that no objections to the Scheme had been received. They also undertook to pay additional filing fees and amend the Scheme accordingly.6. Auditors' Certificates and Sanction of the Scheme:Certificates from statutory auditors confirming accounting treatment conformity with applicable standards were submitted. The Tribunal found no impediment in sanctioning the Scheme, deeming it fair, reasonable, and compliant with statutory requirements under Sections 230-232 of the Act.7. Final Order and Directions:The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme, emphasizing that the order did not exempt the companies from payment of stamp duty, taxes, or any other charges as per law. The Petitioner Companies were directed to comply with all statutory requirements and were given the liberty to seek further directions from the Tribunal if necessary.This detailed analysis covers the legal judgment delivered by the National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, regarding the sanctioning of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving three companies under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found