Assessment Reopening Order Quashed; Commissioner Instructed to Address Tax Escapement Issue

The Court quashed the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax's order reopening the assessment for the assessment year 2015-16, directing a reasoned order after granting a hearing to the petitioner. The Court emphasized the need to consider potential tax escapement due to the available deduction under Section 80IA, as the reassessment was based on this assumption. The Commissioner was instructed to address all points, including the tax escapement issue. The Court disposed of the writ petition, clarifying that the respondent did not admit the allegations due to the absence of affidavits and ordered the provision of an urgent certified copy of the order to the parties.

---

---

Issues:
Reopening of assessment under Sections 147 to 150 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16 based on the application of CBDT Circular No.09/2014 by the assessee and the denial of the circular's applicability by the Income Tax Department. The contention regarding the eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IA and the tax neutrality aspect due to the availability of deduction.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an application under Section 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax regarding the reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2015-16. The main issue revolves around the application of CBDT Circular No.09/2014 by the assessee for claiming amortization expenses, which the Income Tax Department contested, stating the circular was not applicable as the assessee was a BOT operator receiving amenities, not toll. The petitioner argued for the circular's applicability based on paragraphs 4 and 5, emphasizing the enduring benefit of expenditure on infrastructure projects under BOT agreements. The respondent, relying on the first paragraph of the circular, contended that as the assessee did not have the right to collect toll, the circular did not apply.

The petitioner further contended that due to eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA, there was no tax escapement even if amortization was not claimed. The judgment highlighted that the impugned order did not address the tax neutrality aspect concerning the deduction under Section 80IA. While acknowledging that other objections raised by the petitioner were addressed, the Court emphasized the necessity for the Commissioner of Income Tax to consider the potential tax escapement due to the available deduction. As the reassessment was based on the assumption of tax escapement, the Court quashed the impugned order, directing the Officer to pass a reasoned order after granting a hearing to the petitioner. The Commissioner was specifically instructed to address all points, including the tax escapement issue due to the deduction under Section 80IA.

The Court concluded by disposing of the writ petition and clarified that the allegations in the petition were not admitted by the respondent due to the absence of affidavits. It further directed the provision of an urgent certified copy of the order to the parties upon completion of formalities.

---