Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether consideration paid for purchase or resale/use of computer software under distribution agreements or end-user licence agreements constitutes royalty taxable under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether tax was deductible at source so as to attract disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The appeals were governed by the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited, which held that payments made to non-resident software suppliers for resale or use of computer software under such agreements do not amount to payment of royalty for the use of copyright. In that view, the amounts were not taxable as royalty in India and the provisions dealing with royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not apply on the facts. As the payment was not royalty, the obligation to deduct tax at source did not arise, and the consequential disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The tax case appeals failed and were dismissed by applying the binding Supreme Court ruling that software licence or resale payments of this kind are not royalty and do not attract withholding tax liability.
Ratio Decidendi: Consideration for the resale or use of computer software under distribution or licence agreements, where no right in the copyright is transferred, is not royalty and therefore does not give rise to taxable income in India or a corresponding obligation to deduct tax at source.