Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was maintainable when the date of service of the demand notice was not proved and the complaint was filed before expiry of the statutory waiting period.
Analysis: The complaint prosecution under Section 138 depends upon fulfilment of the statutory ingredients, including service of demand notice and failure to pay within 15 days of receipt of that notice. The record did not establish the actual service date of the registered notice. The courts below presumed service merely because the notice had been sent to the district where the accused resided, and treated it as served within a few days of dispatch. That presumption was held to be unsustainable. The legal position applied was that the cause of action arises only after expiry of 15 days from receipt or deemed service of notice, and a complaint filed before that stage is premature. On the facts, even on deemed service, the complaint was instituted before the statutory period had elapsed.
Conclusion: The complaint was premature and not legally maintainable, so the conviction and sentence could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded, the accused was acquitted, and the impugned judgments were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is maintainable only after the demand notice has been served or deemed served and 15 days have expired thereafter; in the absence of proof of service, a complaint filed before expiry of that statutory period is premature and liable to fail.