Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for alleged non-compliance with notices under section 142(1), in view of the assessee's eventual compliance and the acceptance of its explanation in quantum proceedings.
Analysis: The assessment record showed that the assessee furnished replies and confirmations, though belatedly, and the Assessing Officer completed the assessment after considering those submissions. The quantum addition based on the same explanation was later deleted, indicating acceptance of the assessee's explanation on merits. In these circumstances, and applying section 273B, the default was not treated as warranting penalty where the assessee had ultimately complied and the explanation was found acceptable.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271(1)(b) was held to be not leviable and was deleted, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned penalty order did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for failure to comply with notices is not exigible where the assessee ultimately complies and the explanation for the alleged default is accepted in the quantum proceedings, attracting the protection of section 273B.