Liquor licence fee and reverse charge service tax: retrospective amendment bars levy on privilege-related charges, while CO2 storage fee remains taxable.

Retrospective amendment under section 117(1) of the Finance Act, 2019 neutralised service tax on State Government liquor licence fees for the relevant period where the levy was linked to the State's exclusive privilege and no taxable service or quid pro quo was shown. On that basis, export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, and excise staff salary and overtime charges were treated as non-taxable under reverse charge, while storage licence renewal fee for CO2 was treated separately and remained taxable. Penalties could not survive where the substantive demand was substantially set aside and the dispute turned on interpretation of the levy and the amended position.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether service tax was payable under reverse charge mechanism on export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, excise staff salary and overtime charges, and storage license renewal fee paid to the State Excise department. (ii) Whether the penalties imposed on the appellant were sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether service tax was payable under reverse charge mechanism on export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, excise staff salary and overtime charges, and storage license renewal fee paid to the State Excise department.

Analysis: The retrospective amendment introduced by Section 117(1) of the Finance Act, 2019 made it clear that no service tax was leviable on taxable service provided by the State Government by way of grant of liquor licence against consideration in the form of licence fee or application fee, by whatever name called, for the relevant period. The levy on export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, and excise staff salary and overtime charges was found to be in the nature of charges connected with the State's exclusive privilege in liquor matters and not consideration for a taxable service. The fee did not involve the requisite element of service or quid pro quo. Storage license renewal fee for CO2 stood on a different footing, as it was not treated as part of the liquor licence regime.

Conclusion: Service tax was not payable on export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, excise staff salary and overtime charges, but it remained payable on storage license renewal fee for CO2.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalties imposed on the appellant were sustainable.

Analysis: Since the demand was substantially set aside and the dispute turned on interpretation of the levy in the context of the retrospective amendment and the nature of the charges, the penalties could not survive for the deleted demands.

Conclusion: The penalties were not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the service tax demand was set aside for all disputed charges except storage license renewal fee for CO2, and the penalty portion was also deleted.

Ratio Decidendi: Fees paid to the State for exercise of its exclusive liquor privilege, where no taxable service or quid pro quo is shown and the levy is retrospectively neutralised for the relevant period, are not exigible to service tax; penalties cannot survive where the substantive demand fails on the principal issues.

---