Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount deposited by the assessee during investigation and before issuance of the show cause notice, though credited by the Department under the head of interest, was required to be deducted while computing the settlement amount under Section 124(2) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2018.
Analysis: Section 124(2) provides that relief under the Scheme is subject to deduction of any amount paid as pre-deposit in appellate proceedings or as deposit during enquiry, investigation or audit when issuing the statement of amount payable. The amount in question was remitted during investigation and before the show cause notice, and its payment was not disputed. The Department's refusal to give credit solely because it was accounted for under the interest head was treated as overly technical. The accounting classification could not override the substantive fact of payment or defeat the object of the Scheme, which was intended to facilitate settlement of legacy indirect tax disputes.
Conclusion: The amount was required to be taken into account under Section 124(2), and the assessee was entitled to credit for the deposit while computing the settlement amount.