No referable question of law found, so the appeal failed and the refusal to make a reference stood.

No question of law arose for reference, as the Supreme Court agreed that the matter did not disclose any substantive legal issue warranting interference. Although the Court reached that conclusion on reasons different from those adopted by the High Court, it affirmed the result that no reference was required and dismissed the appeal. The ruling confirms that where the record reveals no referable question of law, the appellate court will not intervene merely because a different reasoning process is advanced.

---

---

Issues: Whether any question of law arose so as to require a reference.

Analysis: The Court agreed with the High Court that no referable question of law was made out, though for reasons different from those adopted by the High Court.

Conclusion: No question of law was required to be referred. The appeal failed.

---