1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Delhi HC Orders Recall of Bank Account Attachment Due to Absence of GST</h1> The Delhi HC allowed the petition, directing the respondent to recall attachment of the petitioner's HDFC Bank account due to absence of GST implications ... Continuation of attachment proceedings - HELD THAT:- The respondent informs that the father of the petitioner had visited the office of the Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax (GST) and has furnished all the requisite information and the transactions in the account of the petitioner were found to be pertaining to the petitioner only, without having any GST implications and the respondent is satisfied that there is no need to continue with the attachment. The respondent is directed to, on or before 3rd February, 2021, send a communication to the HDFC Bank of the petitioner, recalling the instructions earlier issued vide letter dated 7th December, 2020 for attachment of the said account - Petition allowed. The Delhi High Court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to recall the attachment of the petitioner's HDFC Bank account as no GST implications were found in the transactions. The order was issued by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula.