Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Scheme of Amalgamation Approved without Shareholder Meetings</h1> <h3>In Re : B.H. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Kajalgaon Carbon Pvt. Ltd., Subhag Power Pvt. Ltd. and Subhag Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus</h3> In Re : B.H. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Kajalgaon Carbon Pvt. Ltd., Subhag Power Pvt. Ltd. and Subhag Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus - TMI Issues Involved:1. Admission of the application.2. Dispensation with meetings of Equity Shareholders.3. Dispensation with meetings of Secured Creditors.4. Dispensation with meetings of Unsecured Creditors.5. Service of notice to regulatory authorities.6. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation.Detailed Analysis:1. Admission of the Application:The application was filed under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking various reliefs, including the admission of the application for hearing by the Tribunal.2. Dispensation with Meetings of Equity Shareholders:The Tribunal was requested to dispense with the convening and holding of separate meetings of Equity Shareholders of both the Transferee Company and the Transferor Companies. This request was based on the fact that all Equity Shareholders had given their written consents via affidavits adopting the Scheme of Amalgamation without any modifications.3. Dispensation with Meetings of Secured Creditors:The Tribunal was asked to declare that there was no requirement for holding meetings of Secured Creditors for the Transferee Company and the Transferor Companies as there were NIL Secured Creditors in these companies.4. Dispensation with Meetings of Unsecured Creditors:The Tribunal was requested to dispense with the meetings of Unsecured Creditors of the Transferee Company and the Transferor Companies. The Unsecured Creditors representing more than 90% in value had given their written consents via affidavits adopting the Scheme of Amalgamation without any modifications.5. Service of Notice to Regulatory Authorities:The Tribunal ordered the Applicant Companies to issue notices in Form No.CAA.3 to the Central Government through the Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Registrar of Companies, Official Liquidator, Income Tax Authorities, and Competition Commission of India. These authorities were to make any representations within 30 days from the receipt of the notice, failing which it would be presumed they had no objections.6. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation:The object of the application was to obtain the Tribunal's sanction for the Scheme of Amalgamation, where the Transferor Companies would merge with the Transferee Company with an appointed date of 01st April 2020. The reasons for the amalgamation included establishing a single company, consolidating business activities, achieving economies of scale, and enhancing profitability and resource utilization. The Board of Directors of each company had approved the scheme, and it was stated that the assets were sufficient to meet liabilities without adversely affecting creditors' rights.The Tribunal, having heard the advocate for the Applicant Companies and considering the consent affidavits from shareholders and creditors, dispensed with the meetings of Shareholders, Secured, and Unsecured Creditors. The application was allowed, subject to the directions for issuing notices to regulatory authorities and filing a compliance report.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the application and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation, directing the Applicant Companies to issue notices to regulatory authorities and file a compliance report. The meetings of Shareholders, Secured, and Unsecured Creditors were dispensed with, considering the consents received.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found