Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Extension of CIRP Period Approved - Resolution Plan Submission Allowed - No Forensic Audit</h1> <h3>The South Indian Bank Limited Versus M/s Atlas Gold Townships (India) Private Limited</h3> The South Indian Bank Limited Versus M/s Atlas Gold Townships (India) Private Limited - TMI Issues Involved:1. Extension of time period of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).2. Audit and closure of accounts of the Corporate Debtor for specified financial years.3. Avoidance of examination of transactions under Sections 43, 45, 50, and 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code), 2016.4. Eligibility and participation of the Resolution Applicant in the voting of the Resolution Plan.Detailed Analysis:1. Extension of Time Period of CIRP:The Resolution Professional (RP) sought an extension of the CIRP period due to delays caused by a national lockdown and other procedural hindrances. The Tribunal examined Section 12 of the I&B Code, 2016, which allows for an extension of the CIRP period beyond 180 days if 66% of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) approves. The CoC, with a 100% voting share, approved the extension. Consequently, the Tribunal extended the CIRP period for an additional 90 days from 11.12.2020.2. Audit and Closure of Accounts:The RP reported that the company's accounts were recorded only up to 29.01.2015, with audits completed up to 31.03.2015. Due to the unavailability of records and staff, the CoC resolved to finalize the accounts with the available records. The Tribunal directed the RP to submit an affidavit from the auditor confirming the status of the accounts and allowed the RP to audit the remaining period through an authorized Chartered Accountant.3. Avoidance of Examination of Transactions:The RP highlighted the difficulties in conducting a forensic audit due to the non-functioning status of the company and lack of records. The CoC, considering the circumstances, resolved not to conduct a forensic audit. The Tribunal approved this resolution, acknowledging the unique challenges faced by the Corporate Debtor.4. Eligibility and Participation of Resolution Applicant:The Home Buyers, who are financial creditors with 3.91% voting rights, formed an association named 'Celestial Garden Owners Association' and submitted a Resolution Plan. The Tribunal referred to Section 30(5) of the I&B Code, which allows the resolution applicant to attend CoC meetings but not vote unless they are also financial creditors. The Tribunal permitted the association to submit the Resolution Plan for CoC's consideration but did not direct the CoC to accept or reject it. The RP was instructed to follow Sections 30 and 31 of the I&B Code and comply with Regulations 38 and 39.Conclusion:The Tribunal disposed of IA/225/KOB/2020 with specific directions:- Extension of CIRP period for 90 days.- Submission of an affidavit regarding the status of accounts.- Approval of CoC's resolution not to conduct a forensic audit.- Permission for the Home Buyers' Association to submit a Resolution Plan, leaving the decision to the CoC.Order Date:Dated the 19th day of January, 2021

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found