Amalgamation scheme sanctioned where statutory compliance, fairness, and public policy tests were met despite tax and regulatory objections.

A scheme of amalgamation under the Companies Act, 2013 was sanctioned where the statutory requirements under sections 230 to 232 were complied with and the scheme was found fair, reasonable, and not contrary to law or public policy. Objections from the Income-tax Department, the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator, including concerns on tax benefit, commercial substance, disclosures, employee protection, accounting treatment, and CSR compliance, were met by affidavits and undertakings. The Tribunal accepted that the amalgamation had a commercial basis, that revenue interests were protected, and that the objections did not justify refusal of sanction. The scheme was approved and made binding on the companies and stakeholders, subject to further statutory compliance.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the proposed scheme of amalgamation should be sanctioned under the Companies Act, 2013. (ii) Whether the objections raised by the Income-tax Department, the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator warranted refusal of sanction.

Issue (i): Whether the proposed scheme of amalgamation should be sanctioned under the Companies Act, 2013.

Analysis: The scheme was examined with reference to the affidavits, auditors' certificate, notices issued to the statutory authorities, and the undertakings furnished by the petitioner-companies. The statutory requirements under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 were found to have been complied with. The scheme was also found to be fair and reasonable, not contrary to public policy, and not violative of law.

Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned.

Issue (ii): Whether the objections raised by the Income-tax Department, the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator warranted refusal of sanction.

Analysis: The objections relating to alleged tax benefit, lack of commercial substance, related-party disclosures, CSR compliance, employee protection, accounting treatment, and regulatory compliance were addressed by the petitioners through affidavits and undertakings. The Tribunal accepted that the amalgamation had a commercial basis, that the revenue interests were protected, and that the issues raised did not justify rejection of the scheme. The undertakings regarding tax proceedings, statutory compliances, employee continuity, and unspent CSR amount were taken on record.

Conclusion: The objections did not prevent sanction of the scheme.

Final Conclusion: The amalgamation was approved and made binding on the concerned companies and their stakeholders, with directions for further statutory compliance.

Ratio Decidendi: A scheme of amalgamation may be sanctioned when the statutory requirements are complied with and the scheme is found to be fair, reasonable, and not contrary to law or public policy, even if objections are raised on tax or regulatory grounds that are met by disclosures and undertakings.

---